Lens 70-200 f2,8 Is Ii vs 70-200 f2,8 III

Jack

Love Macro

Staff member

3 3 1

Mar 13, 2020

11,901

24

8,217

1,339

• Mar 18, 2020

• #1

hello. What do you think , what’s the main difference between 70-200 mark 2 and mark 3? is worth invest money and selling old version?

 

D

Developers

New Member

1 1

Mar 15, 2020

96

78

432

• Mar 19, 2020

• #2

I don't think it's a big difference, the only difference it's because of white colour a bit more bright, and a small improvements on contrast, apart from that, is just waste of money

 

D

Deleted member 12

Guest

• Mar 20, 2020

• #3

I don’t see point to spend so much money for a new version. The good thing is the old version is more cheaper now.

 

Jack

Love Macro

Staff member

3 3 1

Mar 13, 2020

11,901

24

8,217

1,339

• Mar 20, 2020

• #4

I checked YouTube too, and everyone says is pointless buying the new version.

 

Karl

New Member

1

Mar 16, 2020

165

77

562

• Mar 30, 2020

• #5

I was looking on YouTube. Not big difference at all.

You can have a look here

 

Reactions: Jack

Jack

Love Macro

Staff member

3 3 1

Mar 13, 2020

11,901

24

8,217

1,339

• Mar 30, 2020

• #6

Karl said:

I was looking on YouTube. Not big difference at all.

You can have a look here

Click to expand...

Thanks for sharing. I’ve decided that’s not worth the the lens for the money.

 

W

Will Roster

New Member

1

Mar 21, 2020

17

5

1

• Mar 30, 2020

• #7

Hi Jack. As you said, there's no difference at all from those two lenses. The good thing is that the mark 2 is dropped in price and is more affordable.