Why do you stack your images? What happens if you dont get end to end sharpness? Do you think stacked photos should be a different category than single shot photos in macro?
Why do you stack your images? What happens if you dont get end to end sharpness? Do you think stacked photos should be a different category than single shot photos in macro?
The question is. Do you need to? Unless it's for a scientific paper it's a matter of artistic perspective.. Right?I'm really someone who wants to have all details of the flower or the insect on my picture. But sometime less is more and it looks better to take one picture with a low DOF than to take a whole stack. It's a phiosophical question... isn't it? Both have their advantages.
And behind 1:1 the DOF is too small for a single shot. Even f32 won't work for this.
I agree, but can you mostly see it. A small flower or a bug which is completly sharp from the front to the back cannot be photographed with only one picture.I do think however that a stacked image should be identified as such when posting
I agree, but can you mostly see it. A small flower or a bug which is completly sharp from the front to the back cannot be photographed with only one picture.
I agree, but can you mostly see it. A small flower or a bug which is completly sharp from the front to the back cannot be photographed with only one picture.
Just curious....see the attached picture. How would have stacking improved it?