The member has asked your opinion about his/her photo(s) attached in the topic.
strongly? On my computer screen the whites are not that off; besides it's during the editing that I wanted it so much lighter and with pastel colors; the original version is so much darker.
This is just my opinion ..) Maybe it's just your idea ...
when it's too overexposed, the whites in Photoshop have the number 255 - which means pure white and there is nothing to do about it to gain some texture. Here most of the petals are still distinguishable
I meant that the frame is too light, monotonous ... Of course, there are no technical overexposures.
oooh yes it's a different version and vision! I also like it; the vignette is something I no longer use but it allows the eye to focus on the main subjecy - the hoverfly in my case
it's beautiful! thank you for sharing that!
I don't think it's overexposed. It's just nice, spring-bright photo. Well done Yohanna.
Imho, Sergey's version is to dark, to dark vignetting I mean.
Original picture is cheerful bright. Sergey's to moody.
- Apr 18, 2020
- 5,854
- 5,132
- 1,447
I prefer this version
. Beautiful composition and the bright light brings me remembers of lovely sunny summer days 