Lens Add-on equipment for the Olympus M.Zuiko 60mm f2.8 Macro

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Join now!
The member want's to discuss about the lens specified in the topic.

Baenki

New Member
1
Sep 9, 2020
182
247
452
I have found a description where someone combined the Olympus 60mm with a Raynox MSN-202 macro conversion lens, extension tubes and the Olympus MC-14 teleconverter which is normally not compatible with the lens.

Setup was:
Camera - > MC-14 teleconverter - > 10mm ring - > 10mm ring - > lens - > Raynox msn-202

I think the rings where mainly to accommodate the front part sticking from the teleconverter which normally would make it impossible to attach it to the lens.

With this setup this person produced really stunning Photos. Here an example of a grain of sand with a size of 1/3mm:
4e685f664192454585a1990d6c702861.jpeg
Credit: oneofone25 on dpreview

My question now is, does anyone have experience with such a Frankenstein Lens or other equipment combinations?

Does a Raynox alone have good effect on magnification? Purely extension tubes? Tubes + converter?

HHow is image quality with those different add-ons, how is handling and ease of use of the lens?

I'm thinking of getting parts or all of the aforementioned combination, not all at once but step by step.

So if anyone has experience with adding equipment to this lens and could tell my about their experiences, it would be appreciated.
 

Jack

Love Macro
Staff member
3 3 1
Mar 13, 2020
11,901
24
8,217
1,339
Hi Baenki Baenki , I never heard about such of weird lens name. And can't comment much. Unless Ron Westbroek Ron Westbroek , Helix_2648 Helix_2648 might know some info about it. Yes the results looks great, but I think requires some knowledge to achieve in terms of equipment set up.
 

Greg

New Member
Legend TEAM
3 1
May 22, 2020
2,553
3,379
786
Hi ! I always used my Olympus 60mm 2.8 macro with a raynox, but I saw pictures without raynox, better pictures without raynox ... Then I put off my raynox and use ONLY the lens, and I prefer my pictures like that ... With my Nikon D7100 + Sigma 105 mm 2.8 macro I tried to use it with 3 extension tube + raynox 250. It's funny but need too much light, too big, too heavy, and the clarity zone approach 0 lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jack

Baenki

New Member
1
Sep 9, 2020
182
247
452
Greg Greg Yeah, I've read that it loses light with the Raynox. Did you use it outside or in a studio setting/at home with lighting. I'd like to use it at home for stacks.
 

Greg

New Member
Legend TEAM
3 1
May 22, 2020
2,553
3,379
786
I used raynox everywhere but now i stop it. I use only the Lens. If i will use raynox, it will be for home shooting i think
 

Ron Westbroek

New Member
1 2
Apr 21, 2020
589
3
1,473
725
Hi Baenki Baenki
I have the raynox 250 and Caruba extension tubes 10 and 16mm.
I stack all my photos and I do that with only the lens (Olympus 60mm 2.8 macro) or with an extension tube the 10mm.
I also sometimes do bracketing up to 200 photos and when I use the raynox there, it just stops halfway because the focus point is too small.
I only use the Olympus 60mm 2.8 macro solo or with an extension tube 10mm.
I don't like using the raynox and the extension tubes together, but that's my opinion.
Stacking is done outside and out of hand and bracketing is done inside with dead insects sometimes in a studio and sometimes just from the coffee table