I saw a lot of macro photographers are using Laowa lenses. Are they better then normal macro lenses? Or it's just marketing?
the best in terms of quality is the
SP 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 VC USD - Tamron
I think there is no difference, but the magnification is often more.
The lens I want (Laowa 25mm f/2.8 2.5-5x ultra macro) has a magnification of 5x and a normal macro lens only has a magnification of 1: 1.
They are especially cheaper than other brands, Laowa 25mm F2.8 2.5-5x Ultra Macro costs 500€ while the equivalent gun costs 1000€.
In terms of photo quality, difficult to comment on, it is an emerging brand, I don't have enough hindsight.
The quality is very good, otherwise I wouldn't buy one, but I haven't got a new camera yet.