Lighting & Studio Why flash is a must in almost all macro scenarios...

Discuss about lighting sources and other equipment which provides source of light in order to achieve detailed photos. Or studio equipment to make arrangements for product photography or other.

Helix_2648

Real-Typer
Legend TEAM
5 3
Apr 20, 2020
5,566
11
7,751
1,340
I bought a flash last summer but only for insects and not for focus stacking. It was hard for me to handle with the flash in manual mode because either the result was too dark or too bright. And I would never use it for my mushroom pictures but of course for insects.

But let's see if I can improve my skills next spring / summer. I'm also thinking about to but a good diffuser for my lens but not as long as I don't know which lens I will buy as this is very important for a good diffuser.
 
Reactions: Chavezshutter

Chavezshutter

New Member
Staff member
Legend TEAM
3 1
Aug 4, 2020
1,366
3
1,778
739
I forced myself to use manual until i got used to it but nowdays I often use TTL, in the past I did not like TTL as i prefer to have full control of anything photography related but since I have started to use flash exposure compensation with TTL I have become a fan. It is easy to setup, gives great results without having to re-adjust your settings when conditions change and if you're using something like a diffuser or simply want more or less exposure you can do do so by adjusting the compensation. I dial up +0.3 to compensate for diffuser and its set, face into sun, back to the sun, indoors or outdoors and its ready to fire. If i want more or less light I just dial compensation, very easy and handy for more time critical photography like events, street photography,etc

Thank you for your comments
 

subbu

New Member
1
Dec 24, 2020
75
96
431
Nice writeup Chavezshutter. Personally i like photos without flash. IT doesn't mean that i never use flash. I do, I have a flash and a good DIY diffuser. Depending on the subject i decide to use flash. I click pics during my nature/photography walks and I always carry tripod and it comes handy to lower my shutter speed in some difficult lighting condition. Overall i can say I use flash around 10-15% of the time. I am trying to focus my attention towards "artistic macro" now a days..
 
Reactions: Chavezshutter

P J Gibbons

New Member
1
May 19, 2021
28
23
5
Hi, I always use a Flash and Diffuser to photograph Insects and other Tiny Creatures as it does Freeze the image and give sharper detail. I however don’t use Flash in all situations, Sometimes I just prefer to use the natural light available. For Me it depends on the situation? With Plants and Flowers for example, if there is good available light , nice backlight etc I may shoot without the Flash especially if I want a nice Soft focused image. I do though use Flash if the light is lower say at Dusk when I am Capturing Golden late evening light as it keeps the ISO Setting down to avoid Noise.
 
Reactions: Chavezshutter

Dalantech

New Member
1
Jun 13, 2021
60
51
12
There are two aspects to light: Hard and soft light, specular and diffused light.

If the light source is large relative to the subject then the light will be soft. Shadows will not be really dark, and the line between what's in and out of the light won't be well defined. If the light is hard then the shadows will be very dark and the line between what's in and out of the light will be well defined. You can make a small light source look soft by getting it close to the subject, and you can make a large light source look harsh by moving it away from the subject. The sun is a good example: Even though it's huge at noon on a clear day the light it produces is harsh because it's small in the sky. Add some light clouds that are acting as a diffuser and the light gets softer.

This next one is the area where a lot of people shooting macro mess up, myself included. A light source can look soft (soft shadows) and still be specular (not well diffused). It can easily happen if the diffuser that you're using is large relative to the subject but there's a hot spot in it because the diffuser isn't really forcing the light to spread out very well. A lot of the flash lighting that I see people using could best be described as "soft specular". Even my own light suffered from not being diffused enough"

Sweat Bee in a Sourgrass Flower VI by John Kimbler, on Flickr

The shadows are soft, but if you look at the specular highlight in the bee's eyes I've lost some detail because the light isn't diffused enough. Learning that soft light does not equal diffused light was a game changer for me, and I built a new diffuser set for my twin flash.

View attachment 15533Foraging Mining Bee III by John Kimbler, on Flickr

A similar subject, but now there's more detail in the specular area of the eyes. In my experience using multiple layers of a thin diffusion material works better than a few thick layers, especially when there isn't very much distance between the flash and the subject when using a macro twin flash.
 

Attachments

  • 51132792745_1f7bbb24b8_b.jpg
    164.2 KB · Views: 0
Reactions: Chavezshutter

Dalantech

New Member
1
Jun 13, 2021
60
51
12
It depends on what you're shooting. If you have full control over the motion (camera on a tripod, completely immobile subject, etc.) then you can use just about any light source. But if you need to freeze motion then a flash with a good diffuser, one that's forcing the light to spread out and not just blocking the light, is a better choice cause the short duration of the light acts as your "shutter" and can help to freeze motion.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…