Hi. I was wondering to ask those Sony owners, why there a lot of people are choosing Sony over other brands, or they are switching from other brands to Sony ?
Someone showed me the price of the Sony in Europe and I was shocked. Over here the bodies are fairly reasonable priced when compared to other brands. Sure the GMaster lenses are pricey but once again have a look at the RF's, you gotta be making some big bucks for those
100% agree about lenses, no getting around that with any camera. Lenses are the biggest factor in good image quality and that is where most of our money goes into.
It's 2020, even a gopro can put out (increasingly improving) 4k and even 8k, mobile phones are getting insane results. You cant just make a photo camera anymore. I was cheering for Canon on their latests release as i think Sony has began to slack off but then 8k and the heat debacle, I was pretty angry at Canon about it tbh. One of the best stills cameras made advertised as a video camera, i dont understand what their marketing and development was thinking. I still love Canon. I learned to shoot on them and if I shot portrait I might even still be using them for their colour tones specially on skin but they need to sort out their video, who asked for 8k? can we even edit it? and why 30 mins record time, didnt that tax get removed a while back? I hate to see it fumble what otherwise would have been one of the best cameras ever made. Maybe one day I might even end up back where I started and switch back to Canon, never know.
Over €2k?!?! That's almost $3,300 AUD! which is only a couple of hundred off buying an A7Riv which is a 62MP monster Sony's flagship photography centric, video secondary camera. What model can you get there for over €2k? I own the A7iii which is a hybrid 24MP camera with good photo and good video, not amazing at either. They are just over $2000 AUD now which is €1214.40.
I see your point about needing or wanting video but I also believe Canon should be able to offer to their customer what Panasonic, Fuji, Nikon, Olympus and Sony do. Good solid 4k video without restrictions on their photo cameras without needing to jump into the proffesional level where camera begin at $5k AUD. 4k is now standard across the brands. Canon can do easily it but wont, I dont understand it. They jumped to 8k and created a toaster oven instead on their new models , I would still use them for stills but I just cant help but ask why would they do this to their new cameras?
If you really think about it, there is no reason at all why a photo camera cant be a video camera. It has a shutter, lenses, a focusing system, why cant it shoot video? Sure it may not be cinema class machine but its well within what it can do. These things may not matter to you and me to a degree but a new customers sees these things and they do add up when making a brand choice.
Of course a Gopro can correct for a single lens via software, easy job. Will it ever be to a DSLR or Full frame level for photos, probably not.
All i will say about mobile phones is a take a closer look at the newer ones and not just their capabilites or specs (108 MPs!!!omg)but their software and what it can do. I was quite surprised to say the least, i will go out on a limb and say future photography will involve a blend of mobile and camera technology. It already does to a degree. Just like you I prefer photography as is but whether we like it or not it is a technology driven art.